Support our work
Decorative header background

Comparison of Mouse and Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium Gene Expression Profiles

Publication year 2015
Published in PLoS One
Authors Anna Bennis, T.G.M.F. Gorgels, J.B. ten Brink, Peter J van der Spek, Koen Bossers, Vivi M Heine, A.A.B. Bergen

BACKGROUND: The human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of age related macular degeneration (AMD). AMD is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. There is currently no effective treatment available. Preclinical studies in AMD mouse models are essential to develop new therapeutics. This requires further in-depth knowledge of the similarities and differences between mouse and human RPE.

METHODS: We performed a microarray study to identify and functionally annotate RPE specific gene expression in mouse and human RPE. We used a meticulous method to determine C57BL/6J mouse RPE signature genes, correcting for possible RNA contamination from its adjacent layers: the choroid and the photoreceptors. We compared the signature genes, gene expression profiles and functional annotations of the mouse and human RPE.

RESULTS: We defined sets of mouse (64), human (171) and mouse-human interspecies (22) RPE signature genes. Not unexpectedly, our gene expression analysis and comparative functional annotation suggested that, in general, the mouse and human RPE are very similar. For example, we found similarities for general features, like “organ development” and “disorders related to neurological tissue”. However, detailed analysis of the molecular pathways and networks associated with RPE functions, suggested also multiple species-specific differences, some of which may be relevant for the development of AMD. For example, CFHR1, most likely the main complement regulator in AMD pathogenesis was highly expressed in human RPE, but almost absent in mouse RPE. Furthermore, functions assigned to mouse and human RPE expression profiles indicate (patho-) biological differences related to AMD, such as oxidative stress, Bruch’s membrane, immune-regulation and outer blood retina barrier.

CONCLUSION: These differences may be important for the development of new therapeutic strategies and translational studies in age-related macular degeneration.

Support our work!

The Friends Foundation facilitates groundbreaking brain research. You can help us with that.

Support our work